Capcom online games like Resident Evil 4 and Satan May well Cry allegedly applied unlicensed copyrighted photos thoroughly in its games to establish out environments, aspects, and even the Resident Evil 4 logo, in accordance to a new lawsuit submitted Friday.
Designer Judy A. Juracek filed her preliminary criticism in a Connecticut court on Friday. In the lawsuit, she alleged that Capcom employed photos from her copyrighted guide, Surfaces, in several game titles, which include Resident Evil 4, Satan Could Cry, and other Capcom video games. Surfaces is a selection of 1,200 pictures of textures that Juracek photographed herself the e-book is supposed to be applied for “visual research” for artists, architects, and designers, according to the book’s description. It was initially revealed in 1996. The collection will come with a CD-ROM of the illustrations or photos — but Juracek mentioned she necessitates people today to license images from her for commercial use by speaking to her directly. Juracek explained in the lawsuit that Capcom under no circumstances contacted her for a license.
Juracek pointed out at the very least 80 pictures that are used in distinctive situations throughout Capcom’s online games, with extra than 100 webpages of documentation. One occasion named out in the lawsuit is concerning a shattered glass texture applied in the Resident Evil 4 logo.
Juracek explained she took the image of glass in Italy. “It is hard to think about that Juracek would get a photograph of shattered glass in Italy and interior mansion door design and style and that Capcom artists would reproduce the actual similar sample of shattered glass in a symbol and interior design with out reward of Juracek’s images,” she claimed in the lawsuit.
In a lot more than 100 web pages of supporting situation files, Juracek pointed out extra than 200 scenarios of her pictures allegedly currently being made use of in Capcom’s games. This features every thing from marbled textures to ornate sculptural specifics that are recognizable and abundant in Capcom games.
Section of Juracek’s evidence comes from the 2020 Capcom info breach, which occurred in November. In that leak, Resident Evil Village’s start plans were prematurely exposed, and own information and facts for hundreds of hundreds of persons had been compromised, such as clients, shareholders, and personnel, Capcom claimed. Capcom reportedly gained a ransom notice in the assault, right before info was leaked on line. That info included some “high resolution visuals of artwork employed in Resident Evil and other games,” Juracek explained.
“The file names for at minimum one of the photos from the Capcom hacked information are the similar file names as all those utilized on the [Surfaces] CD-ROM,” she alleged. The lawsuit shows a metal texture that was labeled “ME009” on Juracek’s CD-ROM, and labeled the same in the Capcom folders.
In the lawsuit, Juracek observed that Capcom was also a short while ago accused of copying Dutch filmmaker Richard Raaphorst’s monster styles for the new Resident Evil Village video game. Raaphorst found out about the allegedly stolen style right after followers contacted him about a single of the figures from his movie Frankenstein’s Army currently being the basis for Village’s propeller-headed undesirable person, Sturm, he advised Eurogamer.
Juracek’s lawyers are asking the courtroom to award her up to $12 million in damages on a depend of copyright infringement. She’s also seeking damages for “false copyright management and elimination of copyright management:,” $2,500 to $25,000 for each individual applied photograph.
A Capcom consultant advised Polygon that the organization is “aware of the lawsuit” and has “no further comment.”
The complete grievance is accessible below.
Update: This story has been current to incorporate a statement from Capcom.
Update (June 7): Jonathan A. Wintertime, Juracek’s law firm, instructed Polygon in an emailed statement: “We put alongside one another a incredibly specific criticism which we believe speaks for alone. Other than that, we have no further remark.”